name: "cs-pmf-check" description: "/cs:pmf-check — Are you before or after product/market fit? A focused Andreessen-mode interrogation that scores the felt signals + the Sean Ellis 40% gate and issues BEFORE-PMF / APPROACHING-PMF / AFTER-PMF with explicit confidence and a single next move."

/cs:pmf-check — Product/Market Fit Interrogation

Command: /cs:pmf-check

A focused slice of the cs-andreessen persona aimed at one question: are you before or after product/market fit? Per Andreessen, PMF is the only milestone that matters and it is not subtle — if you have to squint to see it, you don't have it.

When to Run

"Are we at product/market fit?"
You're deciding whether to scale (spend on growth/sales) or keep iterating on the product.
You're tempted to raise/hire/expand and want a hard read on whether the fit is real first.

What You Get

A focused interrogation, then a deterministic verdict:

The felt-signal test (Andreessen): are customers buying as fast as you can make it? Is usage growing as fast as you can add servers? Is money piling up? Are you hiring support as fast as you can?
The Sean Ellis 40% gate (Ellis, not Andreessen): do ≥40% of users say they'd be "very disappointed" without you?
Verdict: BEFORE-PMF / APPROACHING-PMF / AFTER-PMF + explicit confidence.
One next move: before PMF → what to change (product/segment/team). After PMF → pour fuel, stop deliberating, feed demand.

Discipline

PMF is not subtle. "Approaching" is the honest verdict for warm-but-ambiguous signals; don't inflate it to "after."
Retention is the strongest single signal. A leaky bucket means you are before PMF no matter how good acquisition looks.
Label the Ellis test as Ellis's, not Andreessen's. Confidence levels mandatory.
No capitulation to wishful reads without new evidence.

Workflow

python ../skills/andreessen/scripts/pmf_signal_scorer.py \
  --ellis-pct 45 --retention 8 --organic 7 --demand 8 --frequency 7

Agent: cs-andreessen
Skill: andreessen
Parent command: /cs:andreessen

Version: 1.0.0

What You Get

A focused interrogation, then a deterministic verdict:

The felt-signal test (Andreessen): are customers buying as fast as you can make it? Is usage growing as fast as you can add servers? Is money piling up? Are you hiring support as fast as you can?

The Sean Ellis 40% gate (Ellis, not Andreessen): do ≥40% of users say they'd be "very disappointed" without you?

Verdict: BEFORE-PMF / APPROACHING-PMF / AFTER-PMF + explicit confidence.

One next move: before PMF → what to change (product/segment/team). After PMF → pour fuel, stop deliberating, feed demand.

Discipline

PMF is not subtle. "Approaching" is the honest verdict for warm-but-ambiguous signals; don't inflate it to "after."

Retention is the strongest single signal. A leaky bucket means you are before PMF no matter how good acquisition looks.

Label the Ellis test as Ellis's, not Andreessen's. Confidence levels mandatory.

No capitulation to wishful reads without new evidence.

cs-pmf-check

让 AI 帮你安装

name: "cs-pmf-check" description: "/cs:pmf-check — Are you before or after product/market fit? A focused Andreessen-mode interrogation that scores the felt signals + the Sean Ellis 40% gate and issues BEFORE-PMF / APPROACHING-PMF / AFTER-PMF with explicit confidence and a single next move."

/cs:pmf-check — Product/Market Fit Interrogation

When to Run

What You Get

Discipline

Workflow

Related

链接

创作者

name: "cs-pmf-check" description: "/cs:pmf-check — Are you before or after product/market fit? A focused Andreessen-mode interrogation that scores the felt signals + the Sean Ellis 40% gate and issues BEFORE-PMF / APPROACHING-PMF / AFTER-PMF with explicit confidence and a single next move."

/cs:pmf-check — Product/Market Fit Interrogation

When to Run

What You Get

Discipline

Workflow

Related