name: "cs-patent" description: "/cs:patent — Patent prior-art + landscape intelligence with mandatory sub-use-case commitment. 6-Q grill-me intake (Q2 picks one of: novelty / FTO / landscape / diligence / litigation). Multi-source search (Google Patents + Espacenet + USPTO + optional Lens.org BYOK). 8-section .docx with verdict + claim text + family-resolved hits + mandatory legal disclaimer (novelty + FTO)."

/cs:patent — Patent Prior-Art + Landscape Intelligence

Command: /cs:patent <invention description>

The cs-patent persona produces a sub-use-case-tailored patent dossier. Refuses generic "patent help" — must commit to one of 5 sub-use-cases at Q2.

Forcing Intake (6 Questions, One at a Time)

Q	Asks	Notes
Q1	Invention (2-3 sentences, specific)	refuses vague; "AI for healthcare" pushed back
Q2	Sub-use-case: novelty / FTO / landscape / diligence / litigation	Forcing — refuses "all of them"
Q3	Jurisdictions (US/EP/CN/JP/KR/PCT/worldwide)	Asked only for FTO/landscape/diligence
Q4	Known prior art (patent number or paper)	Anchor; accept "none"
Q5	Risk tolerance: strict / signal-gathering	Asked for novelty + FTO
Q6	Attorney status (have you spoken to one?)	Asked for novelty + FTO; triggers disclaimer

Stop condition: after Q6 (or earlier with skips). Never re-open.

What You Get

patent_<invention-slug>_<sub-use-case>_<YYYY-MM-DD>.docx

8 sections:
1. Executive Summary + Verdict (NOVEL/CLEAR/FLAGGED/etc.) + legal disclaimer
2. Closest Prior Art (5-10 ranked, claim-text extracted, hyperlinked)
3. Patent Landscape (top filers, 10-yr trend, CPC distribution)
4. Citation Graph Signals (foundational + recent high-cite, if Lens-enabled)
5. Geographic Coverage (FTO/landscape/diligence only)
6. FTO Flags (FTO only — risk per claim per jurisdiction)
7. Strategy + Recommendations (sub-use-case-specific)
8. Audit Log (searches, counts, plan-tier, attorney reminder)

Per-Sub-Use-Case Behavior

Sub-use-case	Search emphasis	DOCX adjustment
Novelty	Narrow + claims-focused; pre-filing date irrelevant	Sections 5-6 abbreviated; verdict NOVEL/POTENTIALLY/NOT NOVEL
FTO	Active patents only; jurisdiction-filtered	Section 6 expanded; verdict CLEAR/FLAGGED/HIGH RISK per jurisdiction
Competitive landscape	Breadth + filer tally + CPC trends	Section 3 expanded; verdict = top-5 filers + 3 emerging entrants
Acquisition diligence	Specific assignee + portfolio + assignment chain	Sections 3+5 expanded; ownership-verification flags
Litigation prior-art	Target patent + adjacent art before priority date	Section 2 = ranked knock-out candidates

Discipline

Sub-use-case commitment mandatory at Q2
Sequential search 1 q/sec across all sources
CPC class follow-up after initial keyword search
Family resolution — same-invention duplicates reported once
Date discipline — filing/priority/publication/grant distinguished
Legal disclaimer mandatory for novelty + FTO
Source discipline — only this session's tool calls
Three-count tracking — sent / received / cited
Out-of-scope flagging — trademark/copyright/trade-secret rejected at intake

Trigger Phrases

"prior art search for [invention]"
"patent search on [topic]"
"freedom to operate analysis"
"FTO for [product]"
"patent landscape for [field]"
"is [invention] novel"
"patents on [topic]"
"competitive patent analysis"
"prior art for litigation"
"patent diligence on [company]"

Anti-Patterns Rejected

Starting any search before user commits to a sub-use-case (refuses generic "patent help")
Batching all intake questions
Accepting vague invention descriptions
Keyword-only search without CPC/IPC class follow-up
Treating family members as separate hits
Confusing filing date with priority/publication/grant date
Skipping legal disclaimer when sub-use-case has legal consequences
Reporting verdict without claim-text evidence
Fabricating Lens.org citation data when key absent
Suggesting design-arounds without acknowledging attorney review required
Skipping audit log

Agent: cs-patent
Skill: patent
Source spec: megaprompts/11-patent-megaprompt.md (maintainer-local draft spec — gitignored, not in the public repo)
Siblings: /cs:litreview, /cs:grants, /cs:dossier, /cs:pulse
Future: /cs:syllabus

Version: 1.0.0 Source: Path-B direct conversion of megaprompts/11-patent-megaprompt.md

Forcing Intake (6 Questions, One at a Time)

Asks

Notes

Invention (2-3 sentences, specific)

refuses vague; "AI for healthcare" pushed back

Sub-use-case: novelty / FTO / landscape / diligence / litigation

Forcing — refuses "all of them"

Jurisdictions (US/EP/CN/JP/KR/PCT/worldwide)

Asked only for FTO/landscape/diligence

Known prior art (patent number or paper)

Anchor; accept "none"

Risk tolerance: strict / signal-gathering

Asked for novelty + FTO

Attorney status (have you spoken to one?)

Asked for novelty + FTO; triggers disclaimer

Stop condition: after Q6 (or earlier with skips). Never re-open.

What You Get

patent_<invention-slug>_<sub-use-case>_<YYYY-MM-DD>.docx 8 sections: 1. Executive Summary + Verdict (NOVEL/CLEAR/FLAGGED/etc.) + legal disclaimer 2. Closest Prior Art (5-10 ranked, claim-text extracted, hyperlinked) 3. Patent Landscape (top filers, 10-yr trend, CPC distribution) 4. Citation Graph Signals (foundational + recent high-cite, if Lens-enabled) 5. Geographic Coverage (FTO/landscape/diligence only) 6. FTO Flags (FTO only — risk per claim per jurisdiction) 7. Strategy + Recommendations (sub-use-case-specific) 8. Audit Log (searches, counts, plan-tier, attorney reminder)

Per-Sub-Use-Case Behavior

Sub-use-case

Search emphasis

DOCX adjustment

Novelty

Narrow + claims-focused; pre-filing date irrelevant

Sections 5-6 abbreviated; verdict NOVEL/POTENTIALLY/NOT NOVEL

FTO

Active patents only; jurisdiction-filtered

Section 6 expanded; verdict CLEAR/FLAGGED/HIGH RISK per jurisdiction

Competitive landscape

Breadth + filer tally + CPC trends

Section 3 expanded; verdict = top-5 filers + 3 emerging entrants

Acquisition diligence

Specific assignee + portfolio + assignment chain

Sections 3+5 expanded; ownership-verification flags

Litigation prior-art

Target patent + adjacent art before priority date

Section 2 = ranked knock-out candidates

Discipline

Sub-use-case commitment mandatory at Q2

Sequential search 1 q/sec across all sources

CPC class follow-up after initial keyword search

Family resolution — same-invention duplicates reported once

Date discipline — filing/priority/publication/grant distinguished

Legal disclaimer mandatory for novelty + FTO

Source discipline — only this session's tool calls

Three-count tracking — sent / received / cited

Out-of-scope flagging — trademark/copyright/trade-secret rejected at intake

Anti-Patterns Rejected

Starting any search before user commits to a sub-use-case (refuses generic "patent help")

Batching all intake questions

Accepting vague invention descriptions

Keyword-only search without CPC/IPC class follow-up

Treating family members as separate hits

Confusing filing date with priority/publication/grant date

Skipping legal disclaimer when sub-use-case has legal consequences

Reporting verdict without claim-text evidence

Fabricating Lens.org citation data when key absent

Suggesting design-arounds without acknowledging attorney review required

Skipping audit log

Agent: cs-patent

Skill: patent

Source spec: megaprompts/11-patent-megaprompt.md (maintainer-local draft spec — gitignored, not in the public repo)

Siblings: /cs:litreview, /cs:grants, /cs:dossier, /cs:pulse

Future: /cs:syllabus

Version: 1.0.0 Source: Path-B direct conversion of megaprompts/11-patent-megaprompt.md

cs-patent

让 AI 帮你安装

/cs:patent — Patent Prior-Art + Landscape Intelligence

Forcing Intake (6 Questions, One at a Time)

What You Get

Per-Sub-Use-Case Behavior

Discipline

Trigger Phrases

Anti-Patterns Rejected

Related

链接

创作者

/cs:patent — Patent Prior-Art + Landscape Intelligence

Forcing Intake (6 Questions, One at a Time)

What You Get

Per-Sub-Use-Case Behavior

Discipline

Trigger Phrases

Anti-Patterns Rejected

Related