name: "cs-linkedin-post"
description: "/cs:linkedin-post — Pick the format the material actually supports, draft to the ~140-character mobile fold, and lint 0-100 across mechanics, hook, integrity, and accessibility. Blocking findings for the 3,000-character cap, engagement bait, and Unicode pseudo-bold."
argument-hint: "[the post idea, or paste a draft to be reviewed]"
/cs:linkedin-post — Format, draft, lint
Command: /cs:linkedin-post [idea or draft]
When to run
- "Write a LinkedIn post about X" / "review my draft"
- "Is this hook any good?"
- "Should this be a carousel or a text post?"
When NOT to run
What you get
- A format recommendation with the constraint it carries — or one question when the top
two score within a point.
- A draft built from your specifics, with a sentence completing inside the first ~140
characters.
- A lint score 0-100 with every finding carrying a fix.
- Accessibility done — alt text written, captions flagged, no pseudo-bold.
Workflow
# 1. Format from the material, not from fashion
python3 ../skills/linkedin-content/scripts/format_picker.py \
--goal authority --material data --material tutorial --minutes 120 --output human
# 2. Draft (the interview comes first: the number, the mistake, the sentence someone said)
# 3. Lint to a clean exit
python3 ../skills/linkedin-content/scripts/post_linter.py \
--input draft.md --has-image --output human
# exit 0 SHIP · exit 2 REVISE (or any blocking finding) · exit 3 REWRITE
Discipline
- Interview before drafting. A post with no specifics cannot be fixed by editing.
- Never fabricate a number, client, result, or quote — not even as a placeholder.
- Write to the mobile fold. A sentence completes before character 140.
- Links in the first comment, and say so in the post.
- No engagement bait. Ask the question the post actually earned.
- One idea per post. If it needs two, it is two posts.
- Cut the first paragraph and check whether the post starts better at paragraph two.
Stop conditions
- Linter at exit 0 → done. Hand over with "you are the author of record; read every line".
- Linter at exit 2 with only warnings the user has knowingly accepted → done, with the
accepted warnings restated.
- Three REWRITE passes on the same draft → the problem is the idea, not the wording. Go back
to the specifics.
Related
