Research and plan a large-scale change, then execute it in parallel across 5–30 isolated worktree agents that each open a PR.
复制下面这句话,粘贴给 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等 AI 编程工具,它会读取安装说明并在你确认后完成安装。
请阅读 https://ai.atlankj.com/install/asset/gh-batch-2c7ff6520344 ,按照其中的说明把「batch」安装到你(当前 AI 工具)中。执行前先告诉我将运行的命令和写入的位置,等我确认。
查看 AI 将读取的安装说明正在读取 GitHub 原文…
内容来自 GitHub 原始文件,由原作者维护。在 GitHub 查看
You are orchestrating a large, parallelizable change across this codebase.
$ARGUMENTS
Call the EnterPlanMode tool now to enter plan mode, then:
Understand the scope. Launch one or more subagents (in the foreground — you need their results) to deeply research what this instruction touches. Find all the files, patterns, and call sites that need to change. Understand the existing conventions so the migration is consistent.
Decompose into independent units. Break the work into 5–30 self-contained units. Each unit must:
Scale the count to the actual work: few files → closer to 5; hundreds of files → closer to 30. Prefer per-directory or per-module slicing over arbitrary file lists.
Determine the e2e test recipe. Figure out how a worker can verify its change actually works end-to-end — not just that unit tests pass. Look for:
claude-in-chrome skill or browser-automation tool (for UI changes: click through the affected flow, screenshot the result)tmux or CLI-verifier skill (for CLI changes: launch the app interactively, exercise the changed behavior)If you cannot find a concrete e2e path, use the AskUserQuestion tool to ask the user how to verify this change end-to-end. Offer 2–3 specific options based on what you found (e.g., "Screenshot via chrome extension", "Run bun run dev and curl the endpoint", "No e2e — unit tests are sufficient"). Do not skip this — the workers cannot ask the user themselves.
Write the recipe as a short, concrete set of steps that a worker can execute autonomously. Include any setup (start a dev server, build first) and the exact command/interaction to verify.
Write the plan. In your plan file, include:
Call ExitPlanMode to present the plan for approval.
Once the plan is approved, spawn one background agent per work unit using the Agent tool. All agents must use isolation: "worktree" and run_in_background: true. Launch them all in a single message block so they run in parallel.
For each agent, the prompt must be fully self-contained. Include:
After you finish implementing the change:
1. **Code review** — Invoke the `Skill` tool with `skill: "code-review"` to find correctness bugs (it reports findings; it does not edit code). Fix any findings it surfaces before continuing.
2. **Run unit tests** — Run the project's test suite (check for package.json scripts, Makefile targets, or common commands like `npm test`, `bun test`, `pytest`, `go test`). If tests fail, fix them.
3. **Test end-to-end** — Follow the e2e test recipe from the coordinator's prompt (below). If the recipe says to skip e2e for this unit, skip it.
4. **Commit and push** — Commit all changes with a clear message, push the branch, and create a PR with `gh pr create`. Use a descriptive title. If `gh` is not available or the push fails, note it in your final message.
5. **Report** — End with a single line: `PR: <url>` so the coordinator can track it. If no PR was created, end with `PR: none — <reason>`.
Use subagent_type: "general-purpose" unless a more specific agent type fits.
After launching all workers, render an initial status table:
| # | Unit | Status | PR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | running | — | |
| 2 | running | — |
As background-agent completion notifications arrive, parse the PR: <url> line from each agent's result and re-render the table with updated status (done / failed) and PR links. Keep a brief failure note for any agent that did not produce a PR.
When all agents have reported, render the final table and a one-line summary (e.g., "22/24 units landed as PRs").