---

description: "Orchestrate git workflow from code review through PR creation with quality gates" argument-hint: " [--skip-tests] [--draft-pr] [--no-push] [--squash] [--conventional] [--trunk-based]"

Git Workflow Orchestrator

CRITICAL BEHAVIORAL RULES

You MUST follow these rules exactly. Violating any of them is a failure.

1. Execute steps in order. Do NOT skip ahead, reorder, or merge steps.
2. Write output files. Each step MUST produce its output file in .git-workflow/ before the next step begins. Read from prior step files — do NOT rely on context window memory.
3. Stop at checkpoints. When you reach a PHASE CHECKPOINT, you MUST stop and wait for explicit user approval before continuing. Use the AskUserQuestion tool with clear options.
4. Halt on failure. If any step fails (agent error, test failure, missing dependency), STOP immediately. Present the error and ask the user how to proceed. Do NOT silently continue.
5. Use only local agents. All subagent_type references use agents bundled with this plugin or general-purpose. No cross-plugin dependencies.
6. Never enter plan mode autonomously. Do NOT use EnterPlanMode. This command IS the plan — execute it.

Pre-flight Checks

Before starting, perform these checks:

1. Check for existing session

Check if .git-workflow/state.json exists:

• If it exists and status is "in_progress": Read it, display the current step, and ask the user:

  Found an in-progress git workflow session:
  Target branch: [branch from state]
  Current step: [step from state]
  
  1. Resume from where we left off
  2. Start fresh (archives existing session)
  

• If it exists and status is "complete": Ask whether to archive and start fresh.

2. Initialize state

Create .git-workflow/ directory and state.json:

{
  "target_branch": "$ARGUMENTS",
  "status": "in_progress",
  "flags": {
    "skip_tests": false,
    "draft_pr": false,
    "no_push": false,
    "squash": false,
    "conventional": true,
    "trunk_based": false
  },
  "current_step": 1,
  "current_phase": 1,
  "completed_steps": [],
  "files_created": [],
  "started_at": "ISO_TIMESTAMP",
  "last_updated": "ISO_TIMESTAMP"
}

Parse $ARGUMENTS for the target branch (defaults to 'main') and flags. Use defaults if not specified.

3. Gather git context

Run these commands and save output:

• git status — current working tree state
• git diff --stat — summary of changes
• git diff — full diff of changes
• git log --oneline -10 — recent commit history
• git branch --show-current — current branch name

Save this context to .git-workflow/00-git-context.md.

---

Phase 1: Pre-Commit Review and Analysis (Steps 1–2)

Step 1: Code Quality Assessment

Read .git-workflow/00-git-context.md.

Use the Task tool to launch the code reviewer:

Task:
  subagent_type: "git-pr-workflows-code-reviewer"
  description: "Review uncommitted changes for code quality"
  prompt: |
    Review all uncommitted changes for code quality issues.

    ## Git Context
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/00-git-context.md]

    Check for:
    1. Code style violations
    2. Security vulnerabilities
    3. Performance concerns
    4. Missing error handling
    5. Incomplete implementations

    Generate a detailed report with severity levels (critical/high/medium/low) and provide
    specific line-by-line feedback.

    ## Deliverables
    Output format: structured report with:
    - Issues list with severity, file, line, description
    - Summary counts: {critical: N, high: N, medium: N, low: N}
    - Recommendations for fixes

    Write your complete review as a single markdown document.

Save the agent's output to .git-workflow/01-code-review.md.

Update state.json: set current_step to 2, add step 1 to completed_steps.

Step 2: Dependency and Breaking Change Analysis

Read .git-workflow/00-git-context.md and .git-workflow/01-code-review.md.

Use the Task tool:

Task:
  subagent_type: "git-pr-workflows-code-reviewer"
  description: "Analyze changes for dependencies and breaking changes"
  prompt: |
    Analyze the changes for dependency and breaking change issues.

    ## Git Context
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/00-git-context.md]

    ## Code Review
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/01-code-review.md]

    Check for:
    1. New dependencies or version changes
    2. Breaking API changes
    3. Database schema modifications
    4. Configuration changes
    5. Backward compatibility issues

    Identify any changes that require migration scripts or documentation updates.

    ## Deliverables
    1. Breaking change assessment
    2. Dependency change analysis
    3. Migration requirements
    4. Documentation update needs

    Write your complete analysis as a single markdown document.

Save output to .git-workflow/02-breaking-changes.md.

Update state.json: set current_step to "checkpoint-1", add step 2 to completed_steps.

---

PHASE CHECKPOINT 1 — User Approval Required

Display a summary of code review and breaking change analysis and ask:

Pre-commit review complete. Please review:
- .git-workflow/01-code-review.md
- .git-workflow/02-breaking-changes.md

Issues found: [X critical, Y high, Z medium, W low]
Breaking changes: [summary]

1. Approve — proceed to testing (or skip if --skip-tests)
2. Fix issues first — I'll address the critical/high issues
3. Pause — save progress and stop here

If user selects option 2, address the critical/high issues, then re-run the review and re-checkpoint.

Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 until the user approves.

---

Phase 2: Testing and Validation (Steps 3–4)

If --skip-tests flag is set, skip to Phase 3. Write a note in .git-workflow/03-test-results.md explaining tests were skipped.

Step 3: Test Execution and Coverage

Read .git-workflow/00-git-context.md and .git-workflow/01-code-review.md.

Use the Task tool:

Task:
  subagent_type: "general-purpose"
  description: "Execute test suites for modified code"
  prompt: |
    You are a test automation expert. Execute all test suites for the modified code.

    ## Git Context
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/00-git-context.md]

    ## Code Review Issues
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/01-code-review.md]

    Run:
    1. Unit tests
    2. Integration tests
    3. End-to-end tests if applicable

    Generate coverage report and identify untested code paths. Ensure tests cover the
    critical/high issues identified in the code review.

    ## Deliverables
    Report with:
    - Test results: passed, failed, skipped
    - Coverage metrics: statements, branches, functions, lines
    - Untested critical paths
    - Recommendations for additional tests

    Write your complete test report as a single markdown document.

Save output to .git-workflow/03-test-results.md.

Update state.json: set current_step to 4, add step 3 to completed_steps.

Step 4: Test Recommendations and Gap Analysis

Read .git-workflow/03-test-results.md and .git-workflow/02-breaking-changes.md.

Use the Task tool:

Task:
  subagent_type: "general-purpose"
  description: "Identify test gaps and recommend additional tests"
  prompt: |
    You are a test automation expert. Based on test results and code changes, identify
    testing gaps.

    ## Test Results
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/03-test-results.md]

    ## Breaking Changes
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/02-breaking-changes.md]

    Identify:
    1. Missing test scenarios
    2. Edge cases not covered
    3. Integration points needing verification
    4. Performance benchmarks needed

    Generate test implementation recommendations prioritized by risk.

    ## Deliverables
    1. Prioritized list of additional tests needed
    2. Edge case coverage gaps
    3. Integration test recommendations
    4. Risk assessment for untested paths

    Write your complete analysis as a single markdown document.

Save output to .git-workflow/04-test-gaps.md.

Update state.json: set current_step to "checkpoint-2", add step 4 to completed_steps.

---

PHASE CHECKPOINT 2 — User Approval Required

Display test results summary and ask:

Testing complete. Please review:
- .git-workflow/03-test-results.md
- .git-workflow/04-test-gaps.md

Test results: [X passed, Y failed, Z skipped]
Coverage: [summary]
Test gaps: [summary of critical gaps]

1. Approve — proceed to commit message generation
2. Fix failing tests first
3. Pause — save progress and stop here

Do NOT proceed to Phase 3 until the user approves. If tests are failing, the user must address them first.

---

Phase 3: Commit Message Generation (Steps 5–6)

Step 5: Change Analysis and Categorization

Read .git-workflow/00-git-context.md and .git-workflow/03-test-results.md.

Use the Task tool:

Task:
  subagent_type: "git-pr-workflows-code-reviewer"
  description: "Categorize changes for commit message"
  prompt: |
    Analyze all changes and categorize them according to Conventional Commits specification.

    ## Git Context
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/00-git-context.md]

    ## Test Results
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/03-test-results.md]

    Identify the primary change type (feat/fix/docs/style/refactor/perf/test/build/ci/chore/revert)
    and scope. Determine if this should be a single commit or multiple atomic commits.

    ## Deliverables
    1. Change type classification
    2. Scope identification
    3. Single vs multiple commit recommendation
    4. Commit structure with groupings

    Write your complete categorization as a single markdown document.

Save output to .git-workflow/05-change-categorization.md.

Update state.json: set current_step to 6, add step 5 to completed_steps.

Step 6: Conventional Commit Message Creation

Read .git-workflow/05-change-categorization.md and .git-workflow/02-breaking-changes.md.

Use the Task tool:

Task:
  subagent_type: "general-purpose"
  description: "Create Conventional Commits message for changes"
  prompt: |
    You are an expert at writing clear, well-structured Conventional Commits messages.
    Create commit message(s) based on the change categorization.

    ## Change Categorization
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/05-change-categorization.md]

    ## Breaking Changes
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/02-breaking-changes.md]

    Format: <type>(<scope>): <subject>
    - Clear subject line (50 chars max)
    - Detailed body explaining what and why (not how)
    - Footer with BREAKING CHANGE: if applicable
    - References to issues/tickets
    - Co-authors if applicable

    ## Deliverables
    1. Formatted commit message(s) ready to use
    2. Rationale for commit structure choice

    Write the commit messages as a single markdown document with clear delimiters.

Save output to .git-workflow/06-commit-messages.md.

Update state.json: set current_step to "checkpoint-3", add step 6 to completed_steps.

---

PHASE CHECKPOINT 3 — User Approval Required

Display the proposed commit message(s) and ask:

Commit message(s) ready. Please review .git-workflow/06-commit-messages.md

[Display the commit message(s)]

1. Approve — proceed to branch management and push
2. Edit message — tell me what to change
3. Pause — save progress and stop here

Do NOT proceed to Phase 4 until the user approves.

---

Phase 4: Branch Strategy and Push (Steps 7–8)

Step 7: Branch Management and Pre-Push Validation

Read .git-workflow/00-git-context.md, .git-workflow/06-commit-messages.md, and all previous step files.

Use the Task tool:

Task:
  subagent_type: "general-purpose"
  description: "Prepare branch strategy and validate push readiness"
  prompt: |
    You are a deployment engineer specializing in git workflows and CI/CD.

    ## Git Context
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/00-git-context.md]

    ## Workflow Flags
    [Insert flags from state.json]

    Based on workflow type (trunk-based or feature-branch):

    For feature branch:
    - Ensure branch name follows pattern (feature|bugfix|hotfix)/<ticket>-<description>
    - Verify no conflicts with target branch

    For trunk-based:
    - Prepare for direct main push with feature flag strategy if needed

    Perform pre-push checks:
    1. Verify all CI checks will pass
    2. Confirm no sensitive data in commits
    3. Validate commit signatures if required
    4. Check branch protection rules
    5. Ensure all review comments addressed

    ## Deliverables
    1. Branch preparation commands
    2. Conflict status
    3. Pre-push validation results
    4. Push readiness confirmation or blocking issues

    Write your complete validation as a single markdown document.

Save output to .git-workflow/07-branch-validation.md.

Update state.json: set current_step to 8, add step 7 to completed_steps.

If --no-push flag is set, skip Step 8 and proceed to Phase 5.

Step 8: Execute Git Operations

Based on the approved commit messages and branch validation:

1. Stage changes: git add the relevant files
2. Create commit(s) using the approved messages from .git-workflow/06-commit-messages.md
3. If --squash flag: squash commits as configured
4. Push to remote with appropriate flags

Important: Before executing any git operations, display the planned commands and ask for final confirmation:

Ready to execute git operations:
[List exact commands]

1. Execute — run these commands
2. Modify — adjust the commands
3. Abort — do not execute

Save execution results to .git-workflow/08-push-results.md.

Update state.json: set current_step to "checkpoint-4", add step 8 to completed_steps.

---

PHASE CHECKPOINT 4 — User Approval Required (if not --no-push)

Git operations complete. Please review .git-workflow/08-push-results.md

1. Approve — proceed to PR creation
2. Pause — save progress and stop here

---

Phase 5: Pull Request Creation (Steps 9–10)

If --no-push flag is set, skip this phase entirely.

Step 9: PR Description Generation

Read all .git-workflow/*.md files.

Use the Task tool:

Task:
  subagent_type: "general-purpose"
  description: "Create comprehensive PR description"
  prompt: |
    You are a technical writer specializing in pull request documentation.
    Create a comprehensive PR description.

    ## Code Review
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/01-code-review.md]

    ## Breaking Changes
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/02-breaking-changes.md]

    ## Test Results
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/03-test-results.md]

    ## Commit Messages
    [Insert contents of .git-workflow/06-commit-messages.md]

    Include:
    1. Summary of changes (what and why)
    2. Type of change checklist
    3. Testing performed summary
    4. Screenshots/recordings note if UI changes
    5. Deployment notes
    6. Related issues/tickets
    7. Breaking changes section if applicable
    8. Reviewer checklist

    Format as GitHub-flavored Markdown.

    Write the complete PR description as a single markdown document.

Save output to .git-workflow/09-pr-description.md.

Update state.json: set current_step to 10, add step 9 to completed_steps.

Step 10: PR Creation and Metadata

Read .git-workflow/09-pr-description.md and .git-workflow/00-git-context.md.

Create the PR using the gh CLI:

• Use the description from .git-workflow/09-pr-description.md
• Set draft status if --draft-pr flag is set
• Add appropriate labels based on change categorization
• Link related issues if referenced

Important: Display the planned PR creation command and ask for confirmation:

Ready to create PR:
Title: [proposed title]
Target: [target branch]
Draft: [yes/no]

1. Create PR — execute now
2. Edit — adjust title or description
3. Skip — don't create PR

Save PR URL and metadata to .git-workflow/10-pr-created.md.

Update state.json: set current_step to "complete", add step 10 to completed_steps.

---

Completion

Update state.json:

• Set status to "complete"
• Set last_updated to current timestamp

Present the final summary:

Git workflow complete!

## Files Created
[List all .git-workflow/ output files]

## Workflow Summary
- Code Review: .git-workflow/01-code-review.md
- Breaking Changes: .git-workflow/02-breaking-changes.md
- Test Results: .git-workflow/03-test-results.md
- Test Gaps: .git-workflow/04-test-gaps.md
- Change Categorization: .git-workflow/05-change-categorization.md
- Commit Messages: .git-workflow/06-commit-messages.md
- Branch Validation: .git-workflow/07-branch-validation.md
- Push Results: .git-workflow/08-push-results.md
- PR Description: .git-workflow/09-pr-description.md
- PR Created: .git-workflow/10-pr-created.md

## Results
- Code issues: [X critical, Y high resolved]
- Tests: [X passed, Y failed]
- PR: [URL if created]

## Rollback Procedures
1. Immediate Revert: Create revert PR with `git revert <commit-hash>`
2. Feature Flag Disable: If using feature flags, disable immediately
3. Hotfix Branch: For critical issues, create hotfix branch from main
4. Communication: Notify team via designated channels