---

description: "Launch a multi-reviewer parallel code review with specialized review dimensions" argument-hint: " [--reviewers security,performance,architecture,testing,accessibility] [--base-branch main]"

Team Review

Orchestrate a multi-reviewer parallel code review where each reviewer focuses on a specific quality dimension. Produces a consolidated, deduplicated report organized by severity.

Pre-flight Checks

1. Verify CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1 is set
2. Parse $ARGUMENTS:
   • <target>: file path, directory, git diff range (e.g., main...HEAD), or PR number (e.g., #123)
   • --reviewers: comma-separated dimensions (default: security,performance,architecture)
   • --base-branch: base branch for diff comparison (default: main)

Phase 1: Target Resolution

1. Determine target type:
   • File/Directory: Use as-is for review scope
   • Git diff range: Use Bash to run git diff {range} --name-only to get changed files
   • PR number: Use Bash to run gh pr diff {number} --name-only to get changed files
2. Collect the full diff content for distribution to reviewers
3. Display review scope to user: "{N} files to review across {M} dimensions"

Phase 2: Team Spawn

1. Use TeamCreate tool to create the team with team_name: "review-{timestamp}" and description
2. For each requested dimension, use Agent tool to spawn a teammate:
   • name: {dimension}-reviewer (e.g., "security-reviewer")
   • subagent_type: "agent-teams:team-reviewer"
   • prompt: Include the dimension assignment, target files, and diff content
3. Use TaskCreate for each reviewer's task:
   • Subject: "Review {target} for {dimension} issues"
   • Description: Include file list, diff content, and dimension-specific checklist

Phase 3: Monitor and Collect

1. Wait for all review tasks to complete (check TaskList periodically)
2. As each reviewer completes, collect their structured findings
3. Track progress: "{completed}/{total} reviews complete"

Phase 4: Consolidation

1. Deduplicate: Merge findings that reference the same file:line location
2. Resolve conflicts: If reviewers disagree on severity, use the higher rating
3. Organize by severity: Group findings as Critical, High, Medium, Low
4. Cross-reference: Note findings that appear in multiple dimensions

Phase 5: Report and Cleanup

1. Present consolidated report:

   ## Code Review Report: {target}
   
   Reviewed by: {dimensions}
   Files reviewed: {count}
   
   ### Critical ({count})
   [findings...]
   
   ### High ({count})
   [findings...]
   
   ### Medium ({count})
   [findings...]
   
   ### Low ({count})
   [findings...]
   
   ### Summary
   Total findings: {count} (Critical: N, High: N, Medium: N, Low: N)
   

2. Send shutdown_request to all reviewers

3. Call TeamDelete to remove team resources